East Central Texas News

Congressman Ellzey has added his support to a Supreme Court amicus brief in the case of Donald J. Trump v. Norma Anderson. The case revolves around whether former President Donald Trump should remain on the ballot in the State of Colorado, despite being the leading candidate for the Republican Party's Presidential nomination. The Colorado Supreme Court had previously decided to remove him from the ballot, a decision that has sparked controversy and legal action.

In a statement, Congressman Ellzey expressed his belief that the American people, not the court system, should have the final say in choosing the Presidential nominee. He emphasized the importance of upholding the integrity of the constitutional republic and preventing any one court's decision from undermining the will of the people and interfering with elections.

Ellzey's decision to join the amicus brief was supported by prominent figures such as Leader Scalise, Senator Cruz, and 176 of his colleagues. Their aim is to challenge the precedent set by the Colorado Supreme Court's ruling and protect the separation of powers outlined in the Constitution.

The filing of the amicus brief is seen as a crucial step in the ongoing legal battle surrounding Trump's eligibility for the ballot in Colorado. The brief argues that the Colorado Supreme Court's decision sets a dangerous precedent and infringes on the rights of voters to choose their preferred candidate.

The Congressman's decision to join the amicus brief has attracted attention and support from various quarters. The move highlights the significance of the case and the desire to ensure a fair and transparent electoral process.

For more information about Congressman Ellzey's support for the amicus brief, visit the official website at [ellzey.house.gov](https://ellzey.house.gov/2024/1/congressman-ellzey-signs-on-to-trump-v-anderson-amicus-brief).

The outcome of the Trump v. Anderson case is eagerly awaited, as it will have implications not only for the Colorado election but also for the broader understanding of the separation of powers and the role of the courts in determining candidates' eligibility.